Media bias
Here we mention instances of serious bias by established news media.
This category doesn't naturally point you to recommended reading material,
but it may serve to warn against being misled by
-
selective presentation of material,
-
choice of language to be sympathetic or unsympathetic to particular causes,
-
or failure to fact-check sources which support the case to which they are
sympathetic.
Media Bias Gaza 2023-24
(March 2024): A report by the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), Media Bias: Gaza 2023-24; the full report is here
Here is an article by
Jonathan Cook, about media reporting of Gaza, including detail about
the accuracy of media reporting of Hamas’ 7 October attack:
How the Western media helped build the case for genocide in Gaza
I've seen more reported about the BBC than other media outlets.
I don't know if that is because they are worse than the others,
or just because we expect better of them. Anyway, here goes:
Here are some recent articles from
Media Lens,
Jonathan Cook,
and others:
So here is an ever-increasing list of reasons to doubt the BBC's neutrality.
-
(December 2023):
Media research shows BBC is very far from ‘biased against Israel’
-
(November 2024):
More than 100 BBC staff accuse broadcaster of Israel bias in Gaza coverage,
also reported in
Al Jazeera and
Middle East Eye.
And here is the letter
-
(November 2024): another letter from BBC journalists, reported
(but not included) here: As Israel pounds Gaza, BBC journalists accuse broadcaster of bias
-
(December 2024): The BBC's Civil War Over Gaza, by Owen Jones,
based on interviews with 13 journalists and other BBC staffers
-
(February 2025): Gaza: How to Survive a War Zone.
This documentary was shown on the BBC, and at first made available on
BBC iPlayer (a video on demand service), but then withdrawn:
A campaign has sought to discredit the documentary using the
father of 14-year-old Abdullah Al-Yazouri, one of the film’s child
protagonists. Dr Ayman Al-Yazouri served as Gaza’s Deputy Minister of
Agriculture, a civil service role concerned with food production.
(see the open letter from 900+ media workers, 600+ leading British Jews call on BBC to restore documentary it deleted to
please Israel lobby groups
and a further response to the BBC).
UPDATE (July 2025): The BBC has now published a review of the affair:
BBC Review of Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone published
I’m a former BBC newsreader – Gaza is the reason I resigned:
Karishma Patel writes
"The controversy over the pulling of the ‘How to Survive a Warzone’
documentary is a distraction from a much bigger problem my old employer
has with impartiality", and is interviewed by Owen Jones here
UPDATE Dec 2025: interviewed again by Owen Jones here,
partly about the Prescott document.
I must say, having glanced at it, it seemed weird:
-
it seemed to assume that differences between BBC Arabic and BBC News (English)
were a cause for criticism of the former, not the latter
-
it discussed in detail various incidents of seven, four and nine
(implied) Israeli civilians being killed, and the way these were covered.
These in mid to late 2024 when, according to all reports, tens of thousands
of civilians in Gaza had been killed
-
(June 2025): The Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM)
has put out a report on BBC bias,
BBC On Gaza-Israel: One Story, Double Standards
with a link to the report here.
Articles in Middle East Eye: BBC coverage of Israel's war on Gaza 'systematically biased against
Palestinians' and War on Gaza: How the BBC sanitises Israel's genocide.
Further articles mentioning an exchange at the launch of the report:
Why BBC editors must one day stand trial for colluding in Israel's genocide,
Burying Genocide – The BBC, Gaza And The Role Of The UK.
And it is not a new issue: this article is about the media generally,
not just the BBC: Al-Aqsa attacks: How the media gives Israel a free pass,
referencing this CfMM report
-
(June 2025): A film, Gaza: Medics Under Fire was produced for the BBC,
but they sat on it for months, and are now not going to show it.
Apparently it is being made available to the producers, Basement Films, to show.
UPDATE: Latest news (28 June 2025): Channel 4 to show Gaza war crimes documentary rejected by BBC:
It will be shown on Channel 4 at 10pm GMT on Wednesday, 2 July.
(3 July) It is now described in
"Gaza: Doctors Under Attack" shows the IDF is the world's most immoral army,
archived here
UPDATE May 2026: it has just won the Current Affairs prize at the BAFTAs, see
It is a national disgrace that the BBC pulled a BAFTA-winning documentary to
>appease Israel, archived here
-
(July 2025) BBC staff: we're forced to do pro-Israel PR:
(quoting this) More than a hundred BBC employees have written a letter to the director general, Tim Davie, complaining
that the Corporation has become a mouthpiece for Israel.
The letter mentions the documentary "Gaza: Medics Under Fire", mentioned above.
It also mentions (not by name) the documentary "How to Survive a Warzone",
also mentioned above.
-
(November 2025) Top boss at the BBC to leave his job:
two top people at the BBC have resigned, after the BBC was
criticised for the way it edited, or put together,
a speech made by US President Donald Trump
(apparently it put together two separate bits of a long speech).
BBC leaders resigned for misrepresenting Trump, but not for misrepresenting
Corbyn (archived here) discussed
other failings of the BBC which apparently aren't regarded as equally serious.
In The BBC is in crisis - for all the wrong reasons,
archived here, Owen Jones points out
The facts are that Donald Trump did incite an insurrection against those
election results. It was completely stupid of Panorama to completely
unnecessarily produce a misleading edit when there was more than enough
evidence to establish this incontrovertible fact. And their misleading
edit did not actually mislead audiences about that basic fact.
The basic fact is - Trump incited an insurrection which sought to overturn
the presidential election. Panorama did not mislead viewers in the sense
of making them believe he did something he didn’t do.
BBC news has a long record of disinformation.
But this time it chose the wrong target,
archived here,
an article by Jonathan Cook about the BBC and what else it has done far worse,
in which he wrote
But Panorama, and the BBC more generally, have been exposed peddling
far worse misinformation. In those cases, there have been precisely no
consequences for such out-in-the-open journalistic abuses.
The reason heads have rolled at the BBC this time are not because it made
a journalistic blunder – it makes them all the time. It is because the
corporation foolishly offered an open goal to the billionaire right and
its media outlets.
If anyone is falling for the manufactured “furore” over Panorama’s
latest journalistic gaffe, there are examples of far graver malpractice by
Panorama – especially on issues related to Israel and Palestine. These
editorial crimes have barely caused a ripple, even after they were exposed.
-
(January 2026) The BBC pushes the case for an illegal war on Iran with even bigger lies
than Trump's, archived here
-
(February 2026)
Why is the BBC defending Trump over the Epstein allegations?,
archived here
-
And another article giving good examples of baised coverage from the BBC and
others, Western media in Iran propaganda overdrive,
archived here
-
Some history, including the BBC actually lying, and destroying news-worthy
material:
The Auntie Blacklist: How the BBC’s “Christmas Tree Files” Rewrote Careers -
and What It Means for Its Israel–Palestine Coverage Today,
archived here
-
(January 2026)
The BBC has been caught telling its staff not to say Maduro was ‘kidnapped’
This item doesn't really belong on this page, but it gives an example
of the BBC in the past.
On 11 and 12 December 1948 a Scots Guards patrol murdered 24 unarmed civilians
in the village of Batang Kali, in Selangor, Malaysia (then Malaya).
And I'm not going to indulge in b/s like "allegedly", rather I quote
Lord Kerr in the Supreme Court case
Keyu & Ors v Secretary of State for ... [2015] UKSC 69, who says (par 204)
[the] shocking circumstances in which, according to the overwhelming
preponderance of currently available evidence, wholly innocent men were
mercilessly murdered and the failure of the authorities of this state
to conduct an effective inquiry into their deaths
So what does the BBC have to do with this?
Well, as recounted in the Supreme Court judgment,
-
An initial "investigation, which seems to have taken a matter of days",
in which "No inquiries were made of inhabitants of the village
“for a very good reason, because they were most unlikely to talk and,
if they did talk, to tell the truth”" exonerated the Scots Guards
(see paras 15-25)
-
In 1969-70, several guardsmen who were part of the patrol alleged that the
deceased had been massacred, one saying that the killings were
“sheer bloody murder […]. [T]hese people were shot down in cold blood.
They were not running away. There was no reason to shoot them”.
Some sort of investigation was started but following the general election
on 18 June 1970 it was scrapped (see paras 26-41)
-
Here is where the BBC comes into the picture.
It broadcast a documentary on 9 September 1992 about the killings,
entitled In Cold Blood (para 42 of the judgment).
This time, the authorities couldn't make the issue "go away".
Not for want of trying:
-
a petition to the Queen met with no response (paras 46-9)
-
the Royal Malaysian Police started an investigation,
including a request for assistance from the UK, which was unfruitful
(paras 50, 54)
-
In 2009 a book Slaughter and Deception at Batang Kali
by Ian Ward and Norma Miraflor appeared.
Reviews on bookseller websites say
"Since its initial publication, Slaughter and Deception at Batang Kali
has spearheaded a quite relentless legal pursuit for justice"
(and, for what it is worth, I highly recommend it)
-
A succession of court cases seeking that the UK Government should institute
a public inquiry (or other similar investigation) into the event -
apparently there are arguable legal grounds for asserting this.
The cases are
[2012] EWHC 2445 (Admin),
[2014] EWCA Civ 312,
[2015] UKSC 69
(already mentioned), and
European Court of Human Rights, Application no. 29753/16
In addition to the references above, note para 309 in the Supreme Court
judgment, which lists "salient points about the background history"
(but in fact omitting the fact that yet uncontradicted official statements
have asserted that relatives of the claimants had attempted to "escape from
lawful custody", and that they were "suspects" (I haven't found what of!)
So all this activity since 1992 seems to have been triggered by the BBC.
I haven't seen anything to indicate what stimulated the BBC's interest then.
And, though a bit off-topic, the article
Suella Braverman demands former colonies pay reparations to London,
archived here,
reminds me of something I read in connection with Batang Kali,
the gist of which is here
Britain’s forgotten war for rubber:
A Colonial Office report from 1950 noted that Malaya’s rubber and tin
mining industries were the biggest earners in the British Commonwealth.
Malaya was described by one British Lord in 1952 as the “greatest material
prize in South-East Asia”, mainly due to its rubber and tin. These
resources were “very fortunate” for Britain, another Lord declared,
since “they have very largely supported the standard of living of the
people of this country and the sterling area ever since the war ended”.
The
British Post Office scandal was brought to public attention largely through
the efforts of
Nick Wallis who was, at the beginning of this story,
was a presenter on BBC Radio Surrey, and made programmes on it for
BBC Television's Panorama and presented the ten-part BBC Radio 4 series
The Great Post Office Trial.
Though his subsequent reporting on the big court case
Bates & Others v Post Office Ltd,
his book
The Great Post Office Scandal, and his involvement in the 2024
television series,
Mr Bates vs The Post Office, was after he had left the BBC.
The story of Nick's involvement is here, Delivering justice for the sub-postmasters
Ironically (since I've put this section in as something positive about the BBC),
Nick has recently written critically about
the BBC's coverage of transgender issues.
The Guardian
This article, Discontent Deepens Among Guardian Staff Over Palestine ‘Double Standard’
discusses its topic at length, including the Guardian's rejection of an
article by Susan Abulhawa, now available here, and she is interviewed here,
and writes on the same theme here, and also at an
Oxford Union debate
This article concerns an article which was "nixed" from the Guardian at
the last minute. It is now available here, A Surge in Suppression, by Dylan Saba.
The Media generally
-
An article analysing media methods by
Jonathan Cook, How the media tears up its own rulebook to hide Israel's atrocities,
archived here
In this article, Breaking free of media group-think is a scary, lonely journey.
I know. I was forced to do it,
archived here,
Jonathan writes of his own experiences trying to get his writings published,
and also those of others. Here are
some of the specific articles his article mentions:
-
A perceptive comment by
Caitlin Johnstone, in
Sometimes The Media Ignoring A Major Story Becomes The Story,
archived here,
where she says
Sometimes the biggest news story of the day is the fact that all
mainstream news outlets are completely ignoring a major news story. It
is interesting how often such instances involve the state of Israel.
-
From MintPress News, Corporate Media Go All Out To Support The US-Israeli War on Iran,
which gives several specific examples of media bias.
-
An excellent article by
Prof Karim / BettBeat Media, which starts out about the bombing of a
primary school in Iran, but then goes on in detail about media bias, and
government control of the media, generally:
Orgy of Western Atrocities Will Not Stop Until the World Decolonizes
Information, archived here
-
An article about media control by the US government, also about the EU attacks
on individual reporters or writers:
Trump's Media Wars:
How the Administration Weaponised Regulation to Break the Press,
archived here
-
Another article about the media's choice of words:
How Western Media Sanitises And Sells The Crimes of Empire,
archived here
-
Jonathan Cook again, in
The West’s bubble of illusion about Israel - and about itself - is finally
being burst, archived here
-
We Analyzed Thousands of News Articles: Here’s the Proof of Pro-Israel Bias
in Mainstream Media
- 'How to Sell a Genocide' exposes the double standards of reporting on Gaza
- An article particularly about the BBC (UK) and ABC (Australia):
Push, Push and Push Again,
archived here
The Voice of Hind Rajab
In the article Genocide isn't a mistake. Which is why the media can't tell you the truth
about Gaza, archived here,
Jonathan Cook discussed the film The Voice of Hind Rajab,
"a devastating dramatised retelling of Israel’s
slow-motion murder of a five-year-old in Gaza",
would not be touched by movie distributors in the USA.
UPDATE Jan 2026: Gaza war docudrama The Voice of Hind Rajab nominated for Academy Award
In that article, he also discusses his experience reporting on Israel for
the Guardian.
See also
I Heard “The Voice of Hind Rajab”,
archived here
Likewise
The Voice of Hind Rajab: The Film They Don’t Want You to See,
archived here
I'm guessing that this is the movie which is referred to in this article,
11 Palestinians injured as Israeli forces raid Birzeit University
in occupied West Bank, which suggests that the raid was to prevent a
screening of the movie.
Karen Attiah
The Washington Post Fired Me — But My Voice Will Not Be Silenced,
archived here
New York Times
Over 150 New York Times contributors to boycott paper over Gaza coverage,
with more detail in this article, Former
New York Times Writers Call Out The Paper For Spreading Zionist Propaganda,
archived here.
The letter is here,
Genocide is not a matter of opinion
The Intercept - Glenn Greenwald
Something else from years ago - I was reminded of it only just now
and realised that it belongs on this website:
see his article
My Resignation From The Intercept,
archived here;
the article in question is here,
Article on Joe and Hunter Biden Censored By The Intercept,
archived here
The Daily Telegraph (UK) - taken over by Springer
At The Telegraph, support for Israel is now mandatory,
archived here
CBS News
Per this article, Bari Weiss Fires CBS Reporter For Questioning Her Zionist Propaganda, And
Replaces Her With A Zionist Israeli.,
archived here,
CBS News’s parent company, Paramount, was bought by Skydance,
owned by David Ellison - then
Once Skydance bought CBS News, David Ellison installed Bari Weiss as
editor-in-chief, a self-described “Zionist Fanatic” who has boasted
that “my Zionist activism is connected to my journalism”.
and the article describes other staff changes.
Writing about Ukraine,
Four Years Later, archived here,
he says
... some reflections of mine on the 4-year war in Ukraine. Interestingly
enough, no one in the UK would publish it. It’s still taboo to argue
that the West had any responsibility for either starting the war or
continuing it at incredible human cost.