Described here
The Streisand effect is an unintended consequence of attempts to hide, remove, or censor information, where the effort instead increases public awareness of the information.The name came about when the famous actress sued (unsuccessfully) to have a photograph of her house removed from the internet. But it
had been downloaded only six times prior to Streisand's lawsuit, two of those being by Streisand's attorneys. Public awareness of the case led to more than 420,000 people visiting the site over the following month.In the case of one recent incident (litigation to have a publicly available report (8MB) removed) the press has noted the Streisand effect, see here
Because of Blackman's heavy-handed lawsuit, Poulson's reporting now has coverage in the San Francisco Chronicle, the Daily Mail, and Courthouse News – a classic example of the so-called 'Streisand effect.'and here
Blackman admitted in his declaration that since he sued Poulson, "the sealed report and its contents ... have been spread and are spreading far more broadly than before." It sounds like he’s already learning about the Streisand Effect — let's make sure the next SLAPP-happy tech bro knows about it too.
Frequently there are attempts to punish or suppress people expressing their views. And I've observed that even when such attempts are well reported, there is often no link to what those people have said or written.
These pages aim to provide those links, with the aim of increasing the readership of that speech or writing. The goal of this is to make the punishment or attempted suppression of it ineffective and counterproductive. And hopefully to deter such punishment or suppression.
Well, I've had this idea for some time, was spurred on to action when one day I got several emails with articles about the police action against Asa Winstanley. So he is the first writer whose work I want to support and publicise.
Thus, for example, where someone complains that the list of MPs in the group called Labour Friends of Israel (in the UK) is no longer accessible, you can do a web search: (in archive.today), first for https://www.lfi.org.uk/*, find the URL you want, which is https://www.lfi.org.uk/lfi-parliamentary-supporters/, then search for that to see the page as it was saved at some past dates, of which the most recent is https://archive.md/ykLus
Or when the complaint is made that Keir Starmer's "ten pledges" have now been erased from his website: (in archive.today), first search for https://keirstarmer.com/* and find the right URL, which is https://keirstarmer.com/plans/10-pledges/, to get the archived version at https://archive.vn/AayAz
I'll probably put this stuff on substack or somewhere similar, if and when I work out how to use it effectively. Meanwhile I do seem to have succeeded in setting up something at https://streisandeffect.substack.com/, and an email address streisandeffect@substack.com So far I've paid more attention to writing than to working out how to put it somewhere like substack; but this page has links to it all.
So what is intended to follow here is an expanding list of references to particular cases, with their consequent reading recommendations. Please send me suggestions of similar items to add!
It may be argued that they have the same right to do this as a mainstream newspaper or news broadcaster - but they certainly shouldn't do this without the public knowing that's what is happening.
Anyhow, my purpose here is to encourage you to read/view material which the social media platforms don't want you to see on account of the political outlook expressed. See this article here.